I'm 14 and I quit Social Media after discovering what was being posted about me

An 8th grader named Sonia Bokhari joined Social Media for the first time when she turned 13, she then discovered that her mom and sister have been posting about her for her entire life.

Her sister would comment on their mother's most recent picture on Facebook or the most recent post on Twitter. Sonia was always curious about what her sister and mom were laughing at, who commented, and who liked their most recent post. Although she was curious she didn't really have much of an interest in Social Media.

Once Sonia turned 13 she got the green light from her parents to join Facebook and Twitter. After she created her account the first thing that she did was to see her mother's profile or account. That when she realized that she has always been on Social Media. While this is her first time creating an account for herself and being allowed to have social media. Her mother has posted countless photos and stories online for everyone to see.

When she saw these photos her mother has been posting for years on Facebook, she was embarrassed and felt deeply betrayed by her own mother.

Teens get a lot of warning about how anything you post on the internet is permanent but parents should also take into account what they are posting and reflect on what they are putting on social media. The things parents post on social media of their kids could come back to haunt them when they become young adults.

https://www.fastcompany.com/90315706/kids-parents-social-media-sharing

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The supreme court

After watching the video in class about how the supreme court works was very helpful. The supreme court originally had 6 chief justices but over time the number of Chief Justices increased to 10 which is what we have today. The supreme court receives about 10,000 petitions a year and they choose which cases they want to go forward with. Majority of the supreme court cases that we see are appeals from lower courts and these cases come from the federal level courts. They won't just take cases that are appeals but they will take cases from the lower federal court that cannot agree on how to interpret the law involved. they accept a wide variety of cases every year. By taking a case that involves an issue that has led to differing opinions in lower courts.
Read more

Agenda Setting

Agenda setting describes a very powerful influence of the media and the ability to tell us what issues are important. In 1922, the newspaper columnist Walter Lippman felt concerned about the media and the power media had to present images to the public. This goes as far back as 1922 and we still see if today in our current society. In 1968 a research was done and they found two elements, awareness and information. The information that they gathered from the research was that McCombs and Shaw’s presidential campaign was mainly focused was to attempt to assess the relationship between what voters in one community said were important issues and the actual content of the media messages used during the campaign. Agenda-setting is the creation of public awareness and concern of salient issues by the news media. Most research of agenda-setting have underlining of two basic assumptions: 1.) The press and media do not reflect reality; they filter and shape it. 2.) media concentration o
Read more

Supreme Court hands Trump administration a victory in immigration battle

On Tuesday the Supreme Court gave the Trump administration a victory in the battle to clamp down on illegal immigration by making it easier to detain immigrants with criminal records. Most people are reading this or maybe don't understand what this means, here's an example,  Federal immigration authorities can detain immigrants awaiting deportation anytime after they have been released from prison on criminal charges. The right-wing conservatives argued that if there was a harsher process on illegal immigration or illegal immigrants then we can start to eliminate this problem. On the other hand, the left-wing liberals argue that the people who get involved with immigration should have a hearing to argue their release while deportation proceedings go forward. With the 5-4 decision on Tuesday, the Supreme Court ruled against them.  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-administration-notches-victory-in-immigration-battle-with-supreme-court-ruling    
Read more